On why being beholden to a platform sucks:
1. You get blamed when the platform breaks your stuff: A couple of weeks ago Ghostery had a load of angry Chrome users complaining we were triggering the popup blocker for all links. Turns out Chrome pushed out a bug which broke the API we were using. Only once we proved it was their fault did they revert the changes. (See the change once we provide the minimal extension code: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=918268)
“Demanding privacy from surveillance capitalists,” says Zuboff, “or lobbying for an end to commercial surveillance on the internet is like asking old Henry Ford to make each Model T by hand. It’s like asking a giraffe to shorten its neck, or a cow to give up chewing. These demands are existential threats that violate the basic mechanisms of the entity’s survival.”
The year is 2019 and I can’t buy a good majority of consumer technology because we lack privacy legislation and consumer protections. Example: it’s absurd that my TV came with spyware that can’t be turned off or avoided; I had to stop it from phoning home at the network level. It also came with an arbitration clause and a clause waiving the right to a class action lawsuit.
I've been thinking for a while that a new model of online advertising with fixed, time-limited spots for all users could disrupt existing adtech and bring a better equilibrium with less tracking and bloat. Disappointed to read that someone tried this and failed: https://blog.zgp.org/a-clean-ad-network-for-independent-sites/
Proud to see that projects my colleagues and I have been working on in the last year at @cliqz
have been mentioned in this list of 'Humane Tech': @WhoTracks_me
, Re-consent and Local Sheriff
you might not have known this, but google - the company you use for searching, email, maps, translation, data storage, watching videos, voice assistant tech, backing up your phone, storing photos, finding images, making purchases, making your phone's operating system, advertising, providing webfonts, running website analytics, providing captcha authentication, and browsing the internet - might be tracking you
As technologists I think it's tempting to believe that decentralization can be achieved if we just had the right tech – better interfaces, more options, the right algorithms, whatever. I've been guilty of this myself; Pinafore is my attempt to make Mastodon's UI more accessible. But Doctorow makes a good case that these are just band-aids on what is fundamentally a policy problem. And unfortunately the policy solutions being floated right now would entrench monopolies rather than break them up.
So it turns out with libdweb we can now polyfill node's net and dgram libraries, and just run anything build on node's network stack directly in the browser: https://github.com/sammacbeth/browserify/commit/7046af105ad403610d1859a738b9ae9a9f4f95a5
Already got a PoC with DAT's discovery-swarm able to discover peers and replicate hyperdrives!
"We are now required to prevent from using the Website unless you change your mind..."
Not that's sure how the GDPR works...
RT @Puri_sm@twitter.com: We are proudly sponsoring the work of Julian Sparber on Fractal, the @email@example.com client for GNOME. Read his latest update - https://blogs.gnome.org/jsparber/2018/12/03/better-room-history-in-fractal/ #LibreDesktop #DemandFreedom #gnome
RT @firstname.lastname@example.org: I wish more open source communities would move their chat away from Slack and use http://matrix.org
Aren't we all fed up with 10k message limits and 32 different logins?
We will be @email@example.com this weekend doing a quick @firstname.lastname@example.org sessiom turning RPI into DAT pinning service on Sunday https://guidebook.com/guide/147793/event/21682675/ #MozFest